I know: the Betrachter who sees this image, taken from the Vorgipfel rather than the eigentlicher Gipfel, will argue «look, the poor man did not have any energy left in order to reach the summit». This is not exactly the case, however: it was a choice that to sacrifice a little of view in direction NW on order to gain a more direct sight on the rocky plateau of the Pale - the one which remains hidden and unknown in the classical Baita-Segantini-like postcard views.
I hope that the Betrachter will be patient for the Beschriftung, which could be long. It is of course understood that, if he wants to help out Beschrifting, his help will be indeed Benvenuto - welcome...
The Besteigung is explained under N.26573.
Location: 46.2968 11.8329
19 HF, Canon G1X, 55 mm equiv, f/5.6, 1/800 sec.
Larger: https://bit.ly/3yrVyhQ
Jochen App, B. B., Michael B., Müller Björn, Michael Bodenstedt, Jörg Braukmann, Klaus Brückner, Hans-Jörg Bäuerle, Harry Dobrzanski, Gerhard Eidenberger, Fabrizio Foppiani, Felix Gadomski, Johannes Ha, Manfred Hainz, Leonhard Huber, Walter Huber, Thomas Janeck, Martin Kraus, Daniel Krähmer, Wilfried Malz, Gianluca Moroni, Wolfgang Pessentheiner, Jan Lindgaard Rasmussen, Danko Rihter, Patrick Runggaldier, Christoph Seger, Michael Strasser, Kathrin Teubl, Jens Vischer
|
|
Kommentare
Ciao
Gerrado
In order to practise also on a wide panorama, I worked on the present object. The outcome has been loaded on the Testplatz 25711. If somebody is willing to have a look, I would be glad to hear some opinion, or even better some hint.
Summarizing. Here: Lightroom "Camera standard". Testplatz: DPP "Standard", with likewise standard Daylight WB...
Now on the Tesplatz you find a version prepared after your suggestions.
This led me to discover another problem...
After converting Raw to Tif with DPP, I went through Hugin (which, incidentally, reports average distances of 2-3 out of 255 when optimizing exposure: never seen such low values in the past). I corrected the creative bugs that Hugin almost never forgets to place across the 360° cut: typically, only an intermittent black vertical lines 2-3 pixels wide, but here the rock wall below the Vezzana was nicely interspersed with short white horizontal lines - but there is no via ferrata on that wall! Only at the end (!!) I went through Lightroom, just to discover that it created an exposure mismatch, although minimal, at the two ends of the final product...
As for the AdobeRGB vs sRGB issue that you raise, I had some similar experiences in the past. However, I an convinced that in the DPP vs LR case, the issues are surely no less evident, but at least more circumscribed. Typically, in daylight shots, I notice irregular saturation of the blue in different regions of the histogram and, in sunset shots, some unpredictable green-violet shift. Now, for example, I was examining the latter issue in N.27299 (DPP version on N.7449 of Panorama Photo).
Kommentar schreiben